Study Aids
Case Briefs Overview
Casebooks
Case Briefs
D

DePiano v. Montreal Baseball Club, Ltd

663 F. Supp. 116 (W.D. Pa. 1987)

From our private database of 47,000+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

DePiano v. Montreal Baseball Club, Ltd

United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania
663 F. Supp. 116 (W.D. Pa. 1987)

Facts

Jeffrey DePiano (plaintiff), a minor-league-baseball player, suffered a career-ending shoulder injury during a game. DePiano sued his team, its major-league parent, and others (baseball teams), alleging negligence for failing to provide timely and adequate medical care and for requiring him to continue playing despite knowing that further injury was likely. DePiano claimed that the baseball teams kept him in the lineup because they lacked outfielders. DePiano later amended his complaint to allege intentional injury, seeking to invoke an exception to the exclusivity of New York’s Workers’ Compensation Act. The baseball teams moved for summary judgment, arguing that DePiano presented no evidence of intentional injury.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Weber, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 899,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,000 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 47,000 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership

Key Terms