District of Columbia v. John R. Thompson Co.

346 U.S. 100 (1953)

From our private database of 47,000+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

District of Columbia v. John R. Thompson Co.

United States Supreme Court
346 U.S. 100 (1953)

Facts

The District of Columbia (the district) (plaintiff) commenced a criminal proceeding against John R. Thompson Co. (Thompson) (defendant), asserting that Thompson had refused to serve Black customers at one of Thompson’s restaurants. The criminal information alleged violations of antidiscrimination statutes passed by the district’s legislative assembly in 1872 and 1873. Those statutes prohibited discrimination or refusal of service on racial grounds. Although the district’s form of government had changed since the statutes were enacted, Congress had never repealed the statutes or authorized a legislative assembly in the district to repeal them. The municipal court quashed the information, and an appellate court held that the statutes were unenforceable and that the information should be dismissed. The appellate court said that the United States Congress had the constitutional authority to delegate municipal legislative powers, but not general legislative powers, to the district. The court reasoned that the antidiscrimination statutes fell under the category of general legislative powers and thus could be enacted only by Congress. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Douglas, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 899,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,000 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 47,000 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership