Drummond v. Oklahoma Statewide Virtual Charter School Board
Oklahoma Supreme Court
558 P.3d 1 (2024)
- Written by Abby Roughton, JD
Facts
Oklahoma included charter schools (i.e., state-funded public schools sponsored by a governmental entity) in the state’s system of free public schools. The Oklahoma Charter Schools Act generally required the state’s charter schools to be nonsectarian (i.e., not related to a particular church or religious faith) in the schools’ programs, admissions policies, and operations. However, in 2023, the state’s Charter School Board (the board) (defendant) approved an application to establish and sponsor St. Isidore of Seville Catholic Virtual School (St. Isidore), a religious virtual charter school. St. Isidore was a private corporation supported by the Archdiocese of Oklahoma City and the Diocese of Tulsa and was admittedly a religious institution that planned to include the Catholic faith in its teaching and other school activities. Oklahoma Attorney General Gentner Drummond (plaintiff) applied to the Oklahoma Supreme Court for a writ of mandamus directing the board to rescind the contract between St. Isidore and the board, asserting that the contract violated state and federal law because St. Isidore was sectarian. Drummond also requested a declaratory judgment that St. Isidore’s contract was unconstitutional.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Winchester, J.)
Dissent (Kuehn, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,000 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

