Johnson v. Barnhart

2006 WL 2329400 (W.D. Tex. 2006)

From our private database of 47,000+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Johnson v. Barnhart

United States District Court for the Western District of Texas
2006 WL 2329400 (W.D. Tex. 2006)

Facts

Leonard Johnson (plaintiff) received old-age-insurance benefits (social security) from the Social Security Administration (SSA). When Johnson first applied for social security, he stated that he was working for the United States Postal Service (USPS) and would receive a USPS pension upon retirement. He acknowledged that when he started receiving the USPS pension, federal law would require a reduction in his social-security payments to prevent the windfall that would otherwise result from receiving payments from two government pension programs. In February 1996, Johnson informed the SSA that he planned to retire in March 1996 and would begin receiving payments from his USPS pension. However, Johnson continued to receive the same amount of social security from the SSA for approximately four years. When the SSA discovered the error in December 1999, it sought repayment from Johnson for the overpaid social-security amounts, which totaled $8,618. Johnson paid under protest. He then filed a claim with the SSA, seeking repayment of the amount the SSA had recovered from him. He argued that he was entitled to a waiver of the SSA’s recovery of the overpayment because he informed the SSA of his retirement and it was the SSA’s error that caused the overpayment. The SSA’s appeals council held that Johnson was not entitled to a waiver of recovery because he failed to notify the SSA of the overpayment and was thus partially at fault. Johnson filed suit in federal district court against SSA commissioner Jo Anne Barnhart (defendant) to challenge that decision.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Biery, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 899,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,000 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 47,000 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership