Kahn v. East Side Union High School District

75 P.3d 30 (2003)

From our private database of 47,000+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Kahn v. East Side Union High School District

California Supreme Court
75 P.3d 30 (2003)

Facts

Olivia Kahn (plaintiff) was a 14-year-old member of the junior-varsity swim team at East Side Union High School District (the district) (defendant). Kahn was participating in a competitive swim meet at the district’s facility when she executed a practice dive into a shallow racing pool and broke her neck. Kahn brought suit against the district for negligence. Kahn argued that her injury resulted from her coach’s failure to provide instruction on safe diving techniques, inadequate supervision, and the coach’s insistence that she dive despite her objections, inexperience, and fear and the coach’s earlier promise to excuse her from diving. The district moved for summary judgment, arguing that Kahn’s claims were barred by the primary-assumption-of-risk doctrine. The trial court granted the district’s motion. The court of appeals affirmed. The California Supreme Court granted review.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (George, C.J.)

Concurrence/Dissent (Kennard, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 899,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,000 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 47,000 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership