Meehan v. PPG Industries, Inc.
United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
802 F.2d 881, 231 U.S.P.Q. 400 (1986)
- Written by Eric Miller, JD
Facts
John Meehan (plaintiff) invented a method and apparatus for dispensing anti-icing products in internal combustion engines. Meehan conveyed exclusive rights in the invention to PPG Industries, Inc. (PPG) (defendant). At this point, no patent application had been filed. The contract between Meehan and PPG required PPG to make an immediate determination as to the patentability of the invention and, with Meehan’s assistance, apply for a patent application if practicable. The contract also required PPG to make royalty payments to Meehan until the resulting patents expired. PPG secured three patents in three countries. The United States patent expired in January 1983, but the Canadian patent on the same invention did not expire until December 1984. Meehan sought to collect royalties from PPG on US sales after the expiration of the US patent but before the expiration of the Canadian patent. Meehan brought suit in federal district court for breach of contract. The court held that PPG had no obligation to pay royalties to Meehan after January 1983. Meehan appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Cummings, C.J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,000 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

