Mohammed Al-Adahi v. Barack Obama
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
613 F.3d 1102 (2010)
- Written by Elliot Stern, JD
Facts
Mohammed Al-Adahi (defendant) was a citizen of Yemen who left for Afghanistan in 2001. In Afghanistan, Al-Adahi lived with his brother-in-law, who was a close associate of Osama bin Laden, the head of the al-Qaida terrorist organization. Al-Adahi met bin Laden twice. Al-Adahi later moved into a guest house that was used by al-Qaida recruits. Al-Adahi also attended an al-Qaida training camp where many of the individuals involved in the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks on the United States were trained. While the American military forces launched attacks in Afghanistan, Al-Adahi traveled between major Afghani cities. Al-Adahi later claimed he did so because he decided to take a vacation. Al-Adahi was injured and crossed the border into Pakistan on a bus carrying wounded fighters. Al-Adahi was captured by Pakistan and later detained at the US military base at Guantánamo Bay. Al-Adahi denied that he was a member of al-Qaida or that he fought against the US. A military tribunal established to evaluate detainees’ connections to terrorist organizations determined that Al-Adahi was a member of al-Qaida. Al-Adahi filed a habeas corpus petition with the district court. The court granted the habeas petition on the grounds that no reliable evidence that Al-Adahi was a member of al-Qaida was presented and ordered Al-Adahi to be released. The government appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Randolph, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,000 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

