Montgomery v. Stephan
Michigan Supreme Court
359 Mich. 33 (1960)
- Written by Brianna Pine, JD
Facts
The husband of Shirley Montgomery (plaintiff) suffered catastrophic injuries after William Stephan (defendant), driving recklessly, struck the husband’s vehicle as he was nearly through an intersection. The collision forced the car into a tree, embedding bark in the husband’s head and causing a brain concussion with risk of epilepsy, four pelvic fractures, an abdominal puncture, kidney failure, and other severe injuries. Following the accident, Montgomery’s husband was left physically weak, in constant pain, unable to sleep, unable to work effectively, and unable to engage in normal social or marital life. Montgomery brought suit against Stephan for loss of consortium, alleging that his negligence deprived her of her husband’s companionship, comfort, aid, and conjugal affection. The trial court dismissed Montgomery’s complaint, holding that a wife could not state a cause of action for loss of consortium, as such an action was traditionally available only to husbands. Montgomery appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Smith, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,000 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

