Morenz v. Wilson-Coker

415 F.3d 230 (2d Cir. 2005)

From our private database of 47,000+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Morenz v. Wilson-Coker

United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
415 F.3d 230 (2d Cir. 2005)

Facts

In 2004, nursing-home resident Robert Morenz (plaintiff) applied for Medicaid through the Connecticut Department of Social Services (DSS) (defendant). Robert’s wife, Clara Morenz (plaintiff), held his power of attorney and completed the application on his behalf. The application included an assignment of spousal-support rights to the state, purporting to transfer to the state any rights Robert had to support from Clara. Clara also submitted a spousal refusal statement in her own name, stating that she refused to further contribute to Robert’s financial support. When assessing Robert’s Medicaid eligibility, the DSS concluded that the assets in his own name were within an institutionalized spouse’s personal limit for Medicaid eligibility. However, it determined that the assets in Clara’s name exceeded the community-spouse resource allowance (CSRA), or the amount that a community spouse was entitled to retain, by approximately $157,500. The DSS therefore concluded that Robert was not Medicaid eligible until the assets in Clara’s name had been spent down. Robert and Clara sued the DSS to challenge its determination, arguing that because Robert had assigned his spousal-support rights to the state, the DSS could not consider Clara’s assets when determining Robert’s Medicaid eligibility. The district court agreed and granted summary judgment in the Morenzes’ favor. The DSS appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Calabresi, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 899,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,000 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 47,000 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership