Mount Vernon Fire Insurance Corp. v. Oxnard Hospitality Enterprise, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
219 Cal. App. 4th 876, 162 Cal. Rptr. 3d 211 (2013)
- Written by Kelly Nielsen
Facts
Roberta Busby (defendant) was a nightclub dancer who worked for Oxnard Hospitality Enterprise, Inc. (Oxnard) (defendant). After a shift one night, a patron threw a flammable liquid on Busby and lit her on fire. Busby sued Oxnard, claiming that its negligence had allowed the attack to occur. In that case, both parties agreed to have the court enter a judgment that Oxnard owed Busby $10 million. Oxnard then assigned (i.e., transferred) to Busby any rights that Oxnard had to insurance coverage for the incident from its own liability insurer, Mount Vernon Fire Insurance Corp. (the insurance company) (plaintiff). This assignment gave Busby a right to collect any insurance proceeds that the insurance company might owe to Oxnard for Busby’s negligence lawsuit. The insurance company filed a separate lawsuit in California state court, seeking a judicial declaration that the insurance company did not owe Oxnard, or Busby as Oxnard’s assignee, any insurance proceeds under Oxnard’s liability policy. The insurance company argued that Oxnard’s policy did not cover Busby’s judgment against Oxnard because the policy expressly excluded coverage for any claim against Oxnard that was based on an “assault or battery.” The policy defined a battery as “negligent or intentional physical contact with another without consent that results in physical or emotional injury.” Busby argued that this exclusion did not apply to her situation because it required “physical contact” and her attacker had not made body-to-body physical contact with her. The trial court ruled that the exclusion applied and prevented insurance coverage for Busby’s judgment against Oxnard. Busby appealed to the California Court of Appeal.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Croskey, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,000 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

