Quantum Exploration, Inc. v. Clark
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
780 F.2d 1457 (1986)
- Written by Eric Miller, JD
Facts
The Indian Mineral Development Act of 1982 (IMDA) enabled Native American tribes to enter contractual agreements for joint ventures with mineral developers, subject to approval by the Secretary of the Interior (defendant). The Blackfeet Tribal Business Council (the council) approved such an agreement with Quantum Exploration, Inc. (Quantum) (plaintiff) for oil-and-gas exploration on Blackfeet lands. The agreement was submitted to the Interior Secretary for the required approval. However, before the Interior Secretary could grant approval or disapproval, the tribe was advised by the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA), an agency of the Interior Department, that the agreement was not in the tribe’s best interests. The council then decided to rescind the agreement. Quantum brought suit against the Interior Secretary in federal district court, alleging that the failure to approve or disapprove constituted a violation of the IMDA. Quantum also alleged that the BIA’s consultation with the tribe was an IMDA violation because it interfered with Quantum’s contractual relations with the council. The court dismissed the suit, holding that Quantum lacked standing. Quantum appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Brunetti, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,000 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

