Rodriguez v. Lasting Hope Recovery Center of Catholic Health Initiatives

955 N.W.2d 707 (2012)

From our private database of 47,100+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Rodriguez v. Lasting Hope Recovery Center of Catholic Health Initiatives

Nebraska Supreme Court
955 N.W.2d 707 (2012)

Facts

Mikael Loyd suffered from mental illness. In 2013, he was placed in Lasting Hope Recovery Center of Catholic Health Initiatives (Lasting Hope) (defendant), where he was treated by psychiatrist Jeana Benton (defendant). Benton initially identified Loyd as posing a risk of harm to others. By the time Loyd was discharged five days later, Benton concluded that Loyd’s risk to others had dissipated. While Loyd was in Lasting Hope, his girlfriend, Melissa Rodriguez, told him that she wanted to end their relationship. Although Loyd at no time conveyed to Benton that he had any desire or intent to harm Rodriguez, he strangled and killed Rodriguez on the night of his discharge. Rodriguez’s parents (plaintiffs), as administrators of Rodriguez’s estate, filed a wrongful-death action against Lasting Hope and Benton, alleging that they had breached a duty to warn Rodriguez of the danger posed by Loyd and a duty to take reasonable measures to protect her from that danger. The trial court granted summary judgment in Lasting Hope and Benton’s favor, reasoning that Lasting Hope and Benton could not be liable because Loyd never expressly conveyed to Benton any desire or intent to harm Rodriguez. Rodriguez’s parents appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Heavican, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 903,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 903,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,100 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 903,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 47,100 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership