Service Employees International Union Local 1 v. Husted

698 F.3d 341 (2012)

From our private database of 47,000+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Service Employees International Union Local 1 v. Husted

United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
698 F.3d 341 (2012)

KS

Facts

Ohio election law required that provisional ballots be cast in the correct precinct. An earlier decision by the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit affirmed a preliminary injunction requiring ballots cast at the right polling location but for the wrong precinct be counted. The circuit court failed to consider if provisional ballots cast in the wrong polling location and for the wrong precinct must also be counted. The Service Employee International Union Local 1 (SEIU) (plaintiff) filed a renewed motion for a preliminary injunction in district court against Ohio Secretary of State Jon Husted (defendant) to require the counting of wrong-place, wrong-precinct ballots. The district court issued a preliminary injunction requiring Ohio and Husted to count provisional ballots cast in the wrong polling place, also called wrong-place/wrong-precinct ballots. Husted moved for a stay of the preliminary injunction and made an emergency appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 899,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,000 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 47,000 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership