State v. Miles

805 S.E.2d 204 (2017)

From our private database of 47,000+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

State v. Miles

South Carolina Court of Appeals
805 S.E.2d 204 (2017)

  • Written by Rose VanHofwegen, JD
Play video

Facts

Sheriff's agents suspected a FedEx package contained illegal drugs. They conducted a controlled delivery to the address listed and saw Lance Miles (defendant) retrieve it. Miles admitted there were drugs inside but did not know what kind. The prosecution charged him with drug trafficking because the box contained more than four grams of oxycodone. The judge instructed that the prosecution had to prove that Miles knowingly brought into the state, and knowingly possessed or attempted to possess, the oxycodone. The jury asked, “Does the [S]tate have to prove that the defendant knowingly brought into the state four grams or more of [o]xycodone or just any amount of illegal drugs in order to consider this trafficking?” The judge responded, “the State does not have to prove that the defendant knew that the drugs in the package were [o]xycodone, just that he knew that the package contained illegal drugs.” Miles appealed his conviction, arguing the prosecution had to prove he knew he possessed oxycodone.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Hill, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 899,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,000 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 47,000 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership