Sturdevant v. Paulsen

218 F.3d 1160 (2000)

From our private database of 47,000+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Sturdevant v. Paulsen

United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
218 F.3d 1160 (2000)

Facts

Katherine Sturdevant (plaintiff) was a full-time history instructor at a Colorado community college. She was terminated from her position and filed a wrongful-termination claim in federal court against the Colorado State Board for Community Colleges and Occupational Education (the board) (defendant). The board’s purpose was to develop and establish state policy for occupational education in the state’s community colleges. Thus, it operated with the same powers and duties as boards of higher-education institutions. In addition, the governor appointed 11 of the 13 members of the board. The board asserted state immunity from suit in federal court under the Eleventh Amendment to the United States Constitution. The district court denied immunity to the board, finding that it was a political subdivision rather than an arm of the state or alter ego. The board filed an interlocutory appeal, arguing that it was an alter ego of the state and was thus an arm of the state for purposes of the Eleventh Amendment.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Lucero, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 899,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,000 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 47,000 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership