Suitum v. Tahoe Regional Planning Agency
United States Supreme Court
520 U.S. 725, 117 S. Ct. 1659, 137 L. Ed. 2d 980 (1997)
- Written by Tanya Munson, JD
Facts
Bernadine Suitum (plaintiff) owned land near the Nevada shore of Lake Tahoe. Suitum applied for a building permit to construct a house on her lot from the Tahoe Regional Planning Agency (the planning agency) (defendant), which regulated land use in the region. The planning agency rated vacant residential properties on their suitability for building and required properties to attain a minimum score to qualify for construction. The planning agency granted property owners certain “Transferable Development Rights” (TDRs) that could be sold to owners of parcels that qualified for construction.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Souter, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,000 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.


