U.S. Bank National Association v. Hunte

215 A.D.3d 887 (2023)

From our private database of 47,000+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

U.S. Bank National Association v. Hunte

New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
215 A.D.3d 887 (2023)

Facts

In May 2006, Adrian Hunte (defendant) executed a note in favor of Mortgage Lenders Network USA, Inc. (MLN). The note was secured by a mortgage on property in Brooklyn. U.S. Bank National Association (U.S. Bank) (plaintiff), MLN’s successor in interest, later commenced a foreclosure action against several individuals, including John and Migdalia Surita (defendants), who allegedly held an interest in the mortgaged premises. The Suritas served an answer, which U.S. Bank rejected as untimely. U.S. Bank then moved for leave to enter a default judgment. The Suritas cross-moved to vacate their default and for leave to serve a late answer, arguing that U.S. Bank lacked standing to foreclose. The trial court granted U.S. Bank’s motion for a default judgment and, in effect, denied the Suritas’ cross-motion. The court found that U.S. Bank demonstrated standing to foreclose by attaching to the complaint a certified copy of the note and an allonge endorsed in blank, which bore matching hole-punch marks and the image of a paperclip, demonstrating that the allonge was physically attached to the note. The Suritas appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning ()

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 899,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,000 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 47,000 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership