United States v. Birbragher

603 F.3d 478 (2010)

From our private database of 47,000+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

United States v. Birbragher

United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
603 F.3d 478 (2010)

  • Written by Tammy Boggs, JD

Facts

Orlando Birbragher (defendant) was an owner and operator of Pharmacom International Corporation (Pharmacom). Pharmacom operated a few websites, such as www.buymeds.com, from which a user could place an order for prescription drugs (Internet pharmacies). On Pharmacom’s websites, users completed a short health-history questionnaire and provided payment information, but Pharmacom did not verify the users’ identities or require submission of any medical records. Pharmacom contracted with doctors, who reviewed the orders and approved them without an in-person examination and, in most cases, without reviewing any medical records. Pharmacom then contracted with pharmacies to fill the purportedly authorized orders. Pharmacom paid millions of dollars to its contracted doctors and pharmacies. Birbragher was charged with conspiracy to distribute controlled substances in violation of the Controlled Substances Act (CSA). Birbragher moved to dismiss the indictment, arguing that the CSA was unconstitutionally vague as applied to him, and the trial court denied his motion to dismiss. Birbragher conditionally pleaded guilty to the charge against him, pending the resolution of his appeal of the trial court’s order.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Shepherd, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 899,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,000 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 47,000 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership