Zaborowski v. Hospitality Care Center of Hermitage, Inc.

2002 WL 32129508 (2002)

From our private database of 47,000+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Zaborowski v. Hospitality Care Center of Hermitage, Inc.

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas
2002 WL 32129508 (2002)

Facts

Michael Zaborowski (plaintiff) admitted his mother, Anna Zaborowski, to Hospitality Care Center of Hermitage, Inc. (Hospitality) (defendant), a Pennsylvania nursing home. The written admissions agreement stated that Hospitality would provide Anna with safe and reasonable care, a safe environment, and care services promoting her highest practicable physical and mental well-being. Between 1997 and 2000, Anna received such care. However, in December 2000, Hospitality terminated its president and director of nursing. Hospitality’s directors and sole shareholders, Faye Cassity and Robert Bible (defendants), hired Nubridge Development Inc. (Nubridge) (defendant) to manage the home. Hospitality sent the residents a letter explaining the change and assuring that Hospitality’s priority continued to be the provision of top-quality care in a safe environment. Under Nubridge’s management, however, Hospitality failed to maintain Anna’s quality of care. She developed various health conditions and died in April 2001. Zaborowski sued Hospitality, Nubridge, Cassity, and Bible (collectively, the Hospitality parties), asserting various claims, including breach of the admissions agreement, fraud based on the Nubridge letter, breach of fiduciary duty, and violation of Pennsylvania’s Unfair Trade Practices and Consumer Protection Law (UTPCPL). The Hospitality parties moved to dismiss Zaborowski’s claims, arguing that they were not viable because nursing-home residents could not assert breach-of-contract claims against nursing homes, the statements in the Nubridge letter were mere puffery, there was no fiduciary relationship between a nursing home and its residents, and the UTPCPL did not apply to the provision of medical services. The court considered the parties’ arguments.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Dobson, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 899,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,000 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 47,000 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership