Sign In
Register with Quimbee Today!
Why Register?
- get paid to add cases learn more
- save case briefs you've searched so you can come back to them later
- keep track of cases you've recently viewed on the site
Register Now
Claim this Case
Once you click on the claim button below, you will have 48 hours to submit your case brief. After 48 hours the case will be released to be claimed by someone else.
American Soc. Of Mechanical Engineers, Inc. v. Hydrolevel Corp.
The Plaintiff / Respondent is Hydrolevel Corp, and the Defendant / Petitioner is the American Society of Mechanical Engineering ("ASME"). The ASME is a nonprofit organization with over 90,000 members from all fields of mechanical engineering.
United States Supreme Court | 456 U.S. 556 (1982)
Angelastro v. Prudential-Bache Securities, Inc.
The plaintiff, Laura Angelastro, had a margin account with the defendant, Prudential-Bache Securities, Inc. Plaintiff averred that the defendant failed to disclose material facts, such as the variable interest rates available to the defendan's clients.
United States District Court | 113 F.R.D. 579 (D.N.J. 1986)
Arizona v. Maricopa County Medical Soc.,
The Defendant-Respondent is the Maricopa County Medical Society ("MCMS"), and the Plaintiff-Petitioner is the State of Arizona. MCMS had organized various foundations for medical care to promote free-for-service medicine.
United States Supreme Court | 457 U.S. 332 (1982)
Aspen Skiing Co. v. Aspen Highlands Skiing Corp.
The Plaintiff / Respondent is the Aspen Highlands Skiing Corporation ("Highlands"), and the Defendant / Petitioner is Aspen Skiing Company ("Ski Co.") Highlands owned one of four major skiing facilities in Aspen, Colorado.
United States Supreme Court | 472 U.S. 585 (1985)
Associated General Contractors of California, Inc. v. California State Council of Carpenters
The Plaintiff/Respondent is the California State Council of Carpenters ("Union"), and the Defendant/Petitioner is the Associated General Contractors of California, Inc ("Associated"). Union and Associated were parties to a collective-bargaining agreement governing employment terms of construction-related Californian industries.
United States Supreme Court | 459 U.S. 519 (1983)
Ayala v. Philadelphia Board of Public Education
William, Jr. (plaintiff) sought to recover damages when his arm was caught in a shredding machine in an upholstery class at the Carrol School in Philadelphia.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania | 453 Pa. 584, 305 A.2d 877 (Pa.1973)
Blank v. Sullivan & Cromwell
This is an action filed by plaintiff, Diane Serafin Blank, against defendant law firm, Sullivan and Cromwell, alleging discrimination against prospective women associates, solely because of sex, in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The action was later certified as a class action.
United States District Court for the Southern District of New York | 16 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 87 (S.D.N.Y. 1976)
Blomkest Fertilizer, Inc. v. Potash Corp. of Saskatchewan, Inc.
This case involves the production and sale of potash, a mineral essential to plant growth and therefore used in fertilizer. The plaintiffs are persons who directly purchased potash from one of the defendants (producers of Potash) between April 1987 and July 1994.
United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit | 203 F.3d 1028 (2000)
Brooke Group Ltd. v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.
The Plaintiff / Petitioner is Brooke Group, Ltd (referred to in the case as "Ligett"), and the Defendant / Respondent is Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. Ligett and Brown & Williamson both developed a line of generic cigarettes.
United States Supreme Court | 509 U.S. 209 (1993)
Brooks v. State
The plaintiff, George Brooks, was convicted of larceny for stealing $200, which belonged to Charles B. Newton.
Supreme Court of Ohio | 36 Ohio St. 46 (1878)
Brown Shoe Co. v. United States
G. R. Kinney Company, Inc. (Kinney) and the Brown Shoe Company, Inc.
United States Supreme Court | 370 U.S. 294 (1962)
Brunswick Corporation v. Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat, Inc.
Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat, Inc. (respondent) brought an action against Brunswick (petitioner), alleging, among other things, that Brunswick's acquisition of six bowling centers in Pueblo's market might substantially lessen competition or tend to create a monopoly in violation of Section 7 of the Clayton Act.
United States Supreme Court | 429 U.S. 477 (1977)
California Retail Liquor Dealers Ass'n. v. Midcal Aluminum, Inc.
The Plaintiff/Respondent is Midcal Aluminum, and the Defendant/Petitioner is the California Retail Liquor Dealers Association. California had a statute requiring wine producers and wholesalers to file fair trade contracts and/or price schedules with the State.
United States Supreme Court | 445 U.S. 97 (1980)
|
|
|
