Sign In
Register with Quimbee Today!
Why Register?
- get paid to add cases learn more
- save case briefs you've searched so you can come back to them later
- keep track of cases you've recently viewed on the site
Register Now
Claim this Case
Once you click on the claim button below, you will have 48 hours to submit your case brief. After 48 hours the case will be released to be claimed by someone else.
Results 1 to 3 of 3 for tag
» enforcement remedies
Hadley v. Baxendale
The plaintiff, appellee, miller was Hadley and the defendant, appellant, carrier was Baxendale (trading under the name Pickford & Co.)The essential facts are that the plaintiff ran an extensive business as a miller in Gloucester.
Court of Exchequer | 156 Eng. Rep. 145 (1854)
Protectors Insurance Service Inc. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company
The plaintiffs, Protectors Insurance, sued the defendants, USF & G, for breaching a contract, for failing to adhere to the contractual clause requiring them to make a good faith effort to rehabilitate their working relationship, in order to avoid termination of their relationship. Consequently, the plaintiff was awarded damages of $35,000 for the sale price of their business below fair market value, which was necessary as a result of their failed relationship with USF & G.
United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit | 132 F.3d 612 (10th Cir. 1998)
Rockingham County v. Luten Bridge Co.
The appellant, Rockingham County, was sued by Luten Bridge Co. for breaching a contract for the construction of a county bridge.
United States Court of Appeal for the Fourth Circuit | 35 F.2d 301 (4th Cir. 1929)
|
|
|
