Results 1 to 6 of 6 for tag » ordinance

City of Edmonds v. Oxford House, Inc.

City of Edmonds, the Petitioner, sought review of decision from the United States Court of Appeals in favor of Oxford House, the Respondent, which reversed a holding that a city zoning code's family definition rule was exempt from the Fair Housing Act. That decision conflicted with another court of appeals' decision declaring a similar family definition provision exempt.

United States Supreme Court | 514 U.S. 725 (1995)

City of Ladue v. Gilleo

Margaret P. Gilleo owns one of the 57 single-family homes in the subdivision of Ladue. On December 8, 1990, she placed on her front lawn a 24- by 36-inch sign printed with the words, "Say No to War in the Persian Gulf, Call Congress Now." After that sign disappeared, Gilleo put up another but it was knocked to the ground.

United States Supreme Court | 512 U.S. 43 (1994)

Commons v. Westwood Zoning Board of Adjustment

The property in question is a vacant lot, located in an established residential area consisting of one and two-family dwellings. This lot is the only undeveloped property in the neighborhood.

Supreme Court of New Jersey | 81 N.J. 597, 410 A.2d 1138 (1980)

Lohmeyer v. Bower

Lohmeyer (Plaintiff, Appellant) contracted to buy land from Bower (Defendant, Appellee) with provision for warranty deed which guaranteed property to be free and clear of all encumbrances except to restrictions of record. Lohmeyer obtained abstract of title which showed a subdivision covenant and city ordinance that land was in violation of.

Supreme Court of Kansas | 170 Kan. 442, 227 P.2d 102 (1951)

State v. City of Rochester

The Rochester Association of Neighborhoods applied for the rezoning of a 1.18-acre tract, owned by the A.

Supreme Court of Minnesota | 268 N.W.2d 885 (1978)

 
About Us l Terms l SoQ l Jobs l Coverage l Ads
Feedback Form