Results 1 to 9 of 9 for tag » damages

American Standard, Inc. v. Schectman

Plaintiffs, American Standard, operated a manufacturing plant on a 26-acre parcel. On the parcel were industrial and office buildings, a 60-ton blast furnace, large lifts, and other equipment used in the business.

Supreme Court of New York, Appellate Division, Fourth Department | 80 A.D.2d 318, 427 N.E.2d 512 (1981)

Ballard v. El Dorado Tire Co.

The plaintiff, Mr. Ballard, sued El Dorado Tire Co. for breach of contract, for wrongfully terminating him. Mr.

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit | 512 F.2d 901 (5th Cir. 1975)

Bruckman v. Pena

Plaintiff William Pena, 16, was injured when the vehicle in which he was riding collided with a truck owned by the defendant, Armored Motors Service. Approximately one year later, the plaintiff was involved in another collision which aggravated the injuries he received in the first.

Colorado Court of Appeals | 29 Colo.App. 357 (1971)

Gruber v. S-M News Co.

The plaintiff, Gruber, sued S-M News Co. for breach of contract, for failing to exercise “reasonable diligence” to sell the 90,000 sets of Christmas greeting cards that they asked Gruber to print and distribute for them.

United States District Court for the Southern District of New York | 126 F.Supp. 442 (S.D.N.Y. 1954)

Kvassay v. Murray

The plaintiff, Kvassay sued Murray for breach of contract, for failing to continue purchasing shipments of baklava as agreed. Murray placed an order for 24,000 cases of baklava, to be delivered over time.

Court of Appeals of Kansas | Kan. Ct. App., 15 Kan. App.2d 426, 808 P.2d 896 (1991)

Mader v. Stephenson

The plaintiff, Mader, sued the defendant, Stephenson, for breach of contract, and was awarded damages. However, a part of Mader’s claim for damages was denied, namely that which sought recovery for their attorney’s fee, travel expenses to and from the trial, and various other expenses associated with the enforcement of the contract.

Supreme Court of Wyoming | Wy. Sup. Ct., 552 P.2d 1114 (1976)

Protectors Insurance Service Inc. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company

The plaintiffs, Protectors Insurance, sued the defendants, USF & G, for breaching a contract, for failing to adhere to the contractual clause requiring them to make a good faith effort to rehabilitate their working relationship, in order to avoid termination of their relationship. Consequently, the plaintiff was awarded damages of $35,000 for the sale price of their business below fair market value, which was necessary as a result of their failed relationship with USF & G.

United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit | 132 F.3d 612 (10th Cir. 1998)

United States v. Carroll Towing Co.

Carroll Towing employees caused a barge, the "Anna C", to break away from its moorings. The barge drifted away from the pier, hit a tanker and then sank.

United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit | 159 F.2d 169 (2nd Cir. 1947)

Wedner v. Fidelity Security Systems, Inc.

The plaintiff, Wedner, sued Fidelity Security for negligently monitoring Wedner’s alarm system. As a result, Wedner sustained a burglary, and consequential loss of $46,180 in furs.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania | Pa. Super Ct., 228 Pa. Super. 67 (1973)

 
About Us l Terms l SoQ l Jobs l Coverage l Ads
Feedback Form