Sign In
Register with Quimbee Today!
Why Register?
- get paid to add cases learn more
- save case briefs you've searched so you can come back to them later
- keep track of cases you've recently viewed on the site
Register Now
Claim this Case
Once you click on the claim button below, you will have 48 hours to submit your case brief. After 48 hours the case will be released to be claimed by someone else.
Results 1 to 12 of 12 for tag
» enforcement remedies
AFLAC, Inc. v. Williams
The appellant, AFLAC retained Williams as legal counsel for a period of seven years, on an “as needed basis.” However, after four years, AFLAC terminated their contract with Williams, and refused to pay as per their damages clause.
Supreme Court of Georgia | Ga. Sup. Ct., 264 Ga. 351 (1994)
Anglia Television v. Reed
The plaintiff, Anglia Television, sued Mr. Reed for breaching a movie contract as the main character.
House of Lords. | House of Lords, 3 All. E.R. 690 (1971)
Ballard v. El Dorado Tire Co.
The plaintiff, Mr. Ballard, sued El Dorado Tire Co. for breach of contract, for wrongfully terminating him. Mr.
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit | 512 F.2d 901 (5th Cir. 1975)
Chronister Oil Co. v. Unocal Refining and Marketing
The plaintiff, Chronister Oil, sued Unocal for breaching a sales contract for 25,000 barrels of gasoline. When Chronister Oil came to deliver the gasoline, Unocal declined the shipment because it contained too much water.
United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit | 34 F.3d 462 (7th Cir. 1994)
Gruber v. S-M News Co.
The plaintiff, Gruber, sued S-M News Co. for breach of contract, for failing to exercise “reasonable diligence” to sell the 90,000 sets of Christmas greeting cards that they asked Gruber to print and distribute for them.
United States District Court for the Southern District of New York | 126 F.Supp. 442 (S.D.N.Y. 1954)
Hadley v. Baxendale
The plaintiff, appellee, miller was Hadley and the defendant, appellant, carrier was Baxendale (trading under the name Pickford & Co.)The essential facts are that the plaintiff ran an extensive business as a miller in Gloucester.
Court of Exchequer | 156 Eng. Rep. 145 (1854)
Kvassay v. Murray
The plaintiff, Kvassay sued Murray for breach of contract, for failing to continue purchasing shipments of baklava as agreed. Murray placed an order for 24,000 cases of baklava, to be delivered over time.
Court of Appeals of Kansas | Kan. Ct. App., 15 Kan. App.2d 426, 808 P.2d 896 (1991)
Lake River Corp. v. Carborundum Co.
The plaintiff, Lake River sued Carborundum for failing to pay liquidated damages that were a part of their contract, when Carborundum breached their contract. Carborundum agreed to ship 22,500 tons of abrasive powder to Lake River, so that Lake River could bag and ship the powder to Carborundum’s customers.
United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit | 769 F.2d 1284 (7th Cir. 1985)
Mader v. Stephenson
The plaintiff, Mader, sued the defendant, Stephenson, for breach of contract, and was awarded damages. However, a part of Mader’s claim for damages was denied, namely that which sought recovery for their attorney’s fee, travel expenses to and from the trial, and various other expenses associated with the enforcement of the contract.
Supreme Court of Wyoming | Wy. Sup. Ct., 552 P.2d 1114 (1976)
National Controls, Inc. v. Commodore Business Machines, Inc.
The plaintiff, National Controls, Inc. (NCI) sued Commodore for breach of contract, for ordering 900 check-out stand scales, and only accepting and paying for 50.
Court of Appeal, First District, Division 3, California | Cal. Ct. App. 163 Cal App. 3d 688 (1985)
Wassenaar v. Towne Hotel
The plaintiff, Wassenaar, sued his employer, Towne Hotel, to enforce a wrongful termination clause in his employment contract. At trial, the circuit court enforced the clause, which provided for Wassenaar’s full salary for the remaining 21 months of his contract, amounting to $24,640.
Supreme Court of Wisconsin | Wis. Sup. Ct., 331 N.W. 2d 357 (1983)
Wedner v. Fidelity Security Systems, Inc.
The plaintiff, Wedner, sued Fidelity Security for negligently monitoring Wedner’s alarm system. As a result, Wedner sustained a burglary, and consequential loss of $46,180 in furs.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania | Pa. Super Ct., 228 Pa. Super. 67 (1973)
|
|
|
