Sign In
Register with Quimbee Today!
Why Register?
- get paid to add cases learn more
- save case briefs you've searched so you can come back to them later
- keep track of cases you've recently viewed on the site
Register Now
Results 1 to 10 of 10 for recently added
Seattle-First National Bank v. Oregon Pacific Industries
On December 12, 1968, Defendant Oregon Pacific Industries (Defendant) purchased plywood from Centralia Plywood. At the time, Centralia Plywood owed a substantial amount of money to Plaintiff Seattle-First National Bank, and assigned the invoice and right to payment on Defendant's purchase to the Plaintiff.
Supreme Court of Oregon | Or. Sup. Ct., 262 Or. 578, 500 P.2d 1033 (1972)
Wedner v. Fidelity Security Systems, Inc.
The plaintiff, Wedner, sued Fidelity Security for negligently monitoring Wedner’s alarm system. As a result, Wedner sustained a burglary, and consequential loss of $46,180 in furs.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania | Pa. Super Ct., 228 Pa. Super. 67 (1973)
Paramount Comm., Inc. v. Time, Inc.
Time, Inc. ("Time") and Warner Bros. Inc. ("Warner") are negotiating a stock-for-stock merger.
Delaware Supreme Court | 571 A.2d 1140 (1990)
AFLAC, Inc. v. Williams
The appellant, AFLAC retained Williams as legal counsel for a period of seven years, on an “as needed basis.” However, after four years, AFLAC terminated their contract with Williams, and refused to pay as per their damages clause.
Supreme Court of Georgia | Ga. Sup. Ct., 264 Ga. 351 (1994)
Kvassay v. Murray
The plaintiff, Kvassay sued Murray for breach of contract, for failing to continue purchasing shipments of baklava as agreed. Murray placed an order for 24,000 cases of baklava, to be delivered over time.
Court of Appeals of Kansas | Kan. Ct. App., 15 Kan. App.2d 426, 808 P.2d 896 (1991)
Beanstalk Group, Inc. v. AM General Corp.
Beanstalk (P) entered into a representation agreement with AM (D) as AM’s (D) exclusive agent to find licensees to use AM’s Hummer trademark. The agreement provided that Beanstalk (P) would receive 35% commission from such license agreements.
United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit | 283 F.3d 856 (7th Cir. 2002)
George v. Davoli
A memorandum stated that Plaintiff was purchasing Indian jewelry for $500, but if the jewelry was unacceptable, the seller (D) would accept its return and refund $440. The memorandum did not include a time limit within which the jewelry had to be returned to the seller (D).
City Court, City of Geneva, N.Y. | Geneva, N.Y. City Ct., 91 Misc. 2d 296, 397 N.Y.S.2d 895 (1977)
Mitchill v. Lath
Mitchill (P) agreed to buy a farm from Lath (D) on the condition that an ice house across the street would be removed. Lath (D) agreed, but that condition was never explicitly put into the written contract for the sale of the property.
Court of Appeals of New York, 1928. | N.Y. Ct. App., 247 N.Y. 377, 160 N.E. 646 (1928)
Estate of Lovekamp
Appellant (wife) and the decedent (husband) were previously married but had been divorced for eighteen years. Appellant alleged that at the time of the divorce, she and decedent entered into an oral agreement that he would pay her $60,000.
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma, Division No. 1 | Okla. Ct. App., 24 P.3d 894 (2001)
Miami Coca-Cola Bottling V. Orange Crush Co.
The contract between the two parties was in the form of a perpetual license where Orange Crush (D) gave Coca-Cola (P) the exclusive right to manufacture, bottle, and distribute Orange Crush within a designated territory. Coca-Cola (P) agreed to sell Orange Crush (D) and operate a bottling company for its production as well as promoting the sale of Orange Crush.
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit | 296 F. 693 (5th Cir. 1924)
|
|
|
