AM/PM Franchise Assn. v. Atlantic Richfield Co.
Pennsylvania Supreme Court
584 A.2d 915 (1990)
- Written by Megan Schwarz, JD
Facts
Atlantic Richfield Co. (ARCO) (defendant) entered into franchise agreements with the AM/PM Franchise Association (Association) (plaintiffs) for the lease of gas stations. The lease required the Association to only sell ARCO gasoline. From 1982 to 1985, ARCO experimented with its own unleaded gasoline formula and then supplied it to the Association. The Association claimed ARCO’s gasoline caused damage to customers’ vehicles. The Association further claimed that profits fell during this period and sued ARCO for breach of warranty seeking consequential damages based on lost profits. The trial court found that the Association’s damages stemmed from lost good will, which was too speculative. The Superior Court affirmed this decision. The Association appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Cappy, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.