From our private database of 30,900+ case briefs...
Apotex USA, Inc. v. Merck & Co., Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
254 F.3d 1031 (2001)
Apotex (plaintiff) is the assignee of two patents relating to a process for making enalapril sodium. Merck (defendant) has been manufacturing and selling enalapril sodium since 1983 under the trade name Vasotec, and has patents to the enalapril sodium compound but not to the process for manufacturing it in tablet form. In 1988, Merck disclosed the ingredients in various internationally-sold tablets. In 1992, Merck also disclosed in a widely circulated Canadian product monograph the ingredients Merck used to manufacture enalapril sodium. In 1991, Merck sued Apotex in Canada for infringement of Merck’s Canadian patent to enalapril sodium. Evidence in the Canadian patent infringement trial included a video deposition of a Merck officer wherein he provided a detailed description of Merck’s method of manufacturing the tablet form of enalapril sodium sold in Canada. Days after this testimony, an Apotex scientist purportedly invented the process claimed in the two Apotex patents at issue in the present case. Apotex filed suit against Merck for infringement of its enalapril sodium patents. Apotex and Merck filed cross-motions for summary judgment. The district court granted Apotex’s motion for summary judgment on the issue of infringement. However, the district court granted Merck’s motion for summary judgment on invalidity grounds because it found that Merck invented within the United States the process claimed in Apotex’s two patents before Apotex, and Merck did not abandon, suppress, or conceal that invention within the meaning of 35 U.S.C. §102(g). Apotex appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Lourie, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 552,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 552,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 30,900 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.