Logourl black

Applestein v. United Board & Carton Corp.

New Jersey Superior Court, Chancery Division
159 A.2d 146 (1960)


United Board and Carton Corporation (United) (defendant) was a publicly traded company with over 1,000 shareholders. Interstate Container Corporation (Interstate) (defendant) was wholly owned by Saul Epstein (defendant). In July 1959, United and Interstate entered into an agreement they labeled a stock exchange agreement. Under its terms, United would acquire all the shares of Interstate and would assume its liabilities. In exchange, Epstein would receive 40 percent of the shares of United. Interstate would be dissolved. Four new directors would be added to the board of United, including Epstein, and Epstein would be in effective control of the board. United’s proxy statement on the issue stated that since the transaction was a stock purchase and not a merger, United’s dissenting shareholders were not entitled to an appraisal of their shares and only a majority vote of shareholders was required to approve it. Dissenting shareholders (plaintiffs) objected and sued United, Interstate and Epstein. They claimed that since the transaction was, in substance, a merger, appraisal rights attached. After cross-motions for summary judgment, the parties submitted by stipulation a single issue for determination: whether the transaction was a de facto merger, entitling United’s shareholders to an appraisal.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.


The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Holding and Reasoning (Kilkenny, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Here's why 91,000 law students rely on our case briefs:

  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners not other law students.
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet.
  • 12,498 briefs - keyed to 168 casebooks.
  • Uniform format for every case brief.
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language.
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions.
  • Ability to tag case briefs in an outlining tool.
  • Top-notch customer support.
Start Your Free Trial Now