From our private database of 26,900+ case briefs...
Ariad Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Eli Lilly & Co.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
598 F.3d 1336, 94 U.S.P.Q.2d 1161 (Fed.Cir.2010) (en banc)
Ariad Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (Ariad) (plaintiff) obtained a patent for its discovery that reducing NF-kB activity could reduce the harms of certain diseases. Ariad identified a transcription factor called NF-kB that activates genes that help fight off infections. Ariad hypothesized that artificially reducing NF-kB could alleviate the symptoms of certain diseases, like aspirin can reduce fever symptoms. It filed for a patent describing several methods of reducing NF-kB activity in cells and hypothesizing three classes of molecules that might do this: specific inhibitors, dominantly interfering molecules, and decoy molecules. Eli Lilly & Co. (Eli Lilly) (defendant) manufactured two drugs that worked by reducing NF-kB activity. Ariad brought suit against Eli Lilly for infringement of the patent. The United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts (District Court) found patent infringement, but did not hold any of Ariad’s claims invalid. The District Court then denied Ariad’s motion for judgment as a matter of law. A panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit reversed the denial and held Ariad’s claims invalid for want of written description. Ariad petitioned for a rehearing en banc, arguing that the first paragraph of 35 U.S.C. § 112 does not contain a written description requirement separate from the enablement requirement, and, alternatively, that if a separate written description is required, Ariad’s description was sufficient to meet this requirement.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Lourie, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 541,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 541,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 26,900 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.