AT&T Corp. v. City of Portland
United States District Court for the District of Oregon
43 F. Supp. 2d 1146 (D. Or. 1999)
AT&T Corp. (A&T) (plaintiff), a cable-modem platform provider, entered into an exclusive contract with @Home, an Internet service provider, to provide high-speed service. The City of Portland’s Cable Regulatory Commission (Commission) (defendant) concluded that the contract would drive local Internet service providers, often known as ISPs, out of the market because the local providers would not be able to compete with AT&T’s service. The Commission passed an open-access mandate, forcing AT&T to allow other Internet service providers access AT&T’s cable-modem platform. Unaffiliated providers would pay AT&T for this access. AT&T sued, contending that the mandate forcing it give everyone access to its cable-modem platform violated its First Amendment rights.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Panner, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 175,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.