Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status

Basile v. H & R Block, Inc.

761 A.2d 1115 (2000)

Case BriefRelatedOptions
From our private database of 33,800+ case briefs...

Basile v. H & R Block, Inc.

Pennsylvania Supreme Court

761 A.2d 1115 (2000)

Facts

Sandra Basile and Laura Clavin (plaintiffs) brought a class action alleging tax-return preparer H & R Block, Inc. (Block), and Mellon Bank (DE) National Association (Mellon) (defendants) deceived customers about refund-anticipation loans (RALs). In 1990, Block began a “Rapid Refund” program that allowed faster refunds than filing paper returns. For a fee, customers could file returns electronically and choose to receive refunds by check, direct deposit, or an RAL. Mellon provided RALs for Pennsylvania customers. If a customer wanted an RAL, preparers simultaneously transmitted return information to the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) and Mellon. Customers would receive a check in a few days for the amount of their refund, minus a flat-rate finance charge of $29 or $35. Block did not disclose the interest rate as a percentage, which ran as high as 151 percent because of the loans’ short-term nature. Basile and Clavin visited Block offices in response to Rapid Refund promotions to file their tax returns and obtain refunds. Basile and Clavin waited in Block’s offices while their returns were prepared to sign them before filing. The preparers said Basile and Clavin could obtain RALs and offered applications. Nobody disclosed that Block earned fees from Mellon for each loan and shared in the profits made from the program or that endorsing the back of the loan-proceeds check meant the customer signed a loan agreement printed on it. The trial court granted summary judgment, reasoning Block owed no fiduciary duty to disclose the loans’ nature absent an agency relationship with the customer. The appellate court reversed, finding Block acted as the customers’ agent. The Pennsylvania Supreme Court granted review.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Castille, J.)

Dissent (Saylor, J.)

Dissent (Nigro, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 605,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 605,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 33,800 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 605,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 33,800 briefs - keyed to 984 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership