Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

Benham v. Morton & Furbish Agency

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
929 A.2d 471 (2007)


Facts

In July 1999, Kathleen Benham (plaintiff) and her family rented a cottage in Maine. The cottage was owned by Aline and Rheal Caron (defendants), but the rental agreement was brokered by Morton & Furbish Agency (Morton & Furbish) (defendant). The Carons hired Morton & Furbish to sell the cottage, but allowed Morton & Furbish to rent it in the meantime, as long as renters were restricted from entering the cottage’s attic. Benham’s sister, Colleen Blevins, arranged to rent the cottage for two weeks without seeing it beforehand. Originally, Blevins contracted to rent a different cottage, but because the cottage was unavailable, Morton & Furbish unilaterally decided to provide the Carons’ cottage. Morton & Furbish supplied the linens, arranged for trash removal, and collected sales tax on the family’s use of the cottage. The family believed that they would use the cottage exclusively, with no one entering the cottage to clean or doing structural work on the cottage. Once the family arrived, they found the trapdoor to the attic was open. Benham began climbing the stairs and then turned around and began to descend. On her way down, she fell and sustained injuries. The ladder had been built by Rheal Caron and had no guard or handrails. Benham filed suit against the Carons and Morton & Furbish for negligent design of the stairs and the existence of a dangerous condition on the premises. The Superior Court granted motion for summary judgment in favor of Morton & Furbish and the Carons, ruling that a landlord and tenant relationship existed between the parties and that landlords are not liable for injuries caused by defective conditions in areas that are exclusively in the possession of a lessee.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Meade, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 200,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.