Berry v. Sugar Notch Borough
Pennsylvania Supreme Court
43 A. 240 (Pa. 1899)
Berry (plaintiff) was a motorman employed by the Wilkes-Barre and Wyoming Valley Traction Company. He worked on the company’s line running from Wilkes-Barre to the Sugar Notch Borough (borough) (defendant). The company was governed by an ordinance stating that it could not operate its cars on the borough’s streets above eight miles per hour. A large chestnut tree stood in the middle of the road, within the borough limits. One evening, Berry was driving his car on the borough’s streets in a violent windstorm. He was traveling considerably in excess of eight miles per hour. Berry drove under the tree and the tree fell down, crushing the car and causing him injuries. Berry brought suit against the borough to recover for his injuries. The trial court awarded him $3,162.50, and the borough appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Fell, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 168,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,800 briefs, keyed to 187 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.