Logourl black
From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...

Board of Trade of Chicago v. United States

United States Supreme Court
246 U.S. 231 (1918)


Facts

The Board of Trade of Chicago (the Board) (defendant) maintained and operated a grain exchange in the Chicago market. The Board established a set of rules to govern transactions at the grain exchange, with different rules for each of the various types of grain sales. One sale type was for to-arrive grain, or grain that was scheduled to arrive at the exchange but was not yet available. In 1906, the Board enacted a rule that prohibited participants in the grain exchange from buying or selling to-arrive grain at a price other than the price listed at the time the exchange closed for the day until the exchange reopened the next business day. The effect was to prevent after-market pricing on grain that was en route and ready to ship upon arrival but that had not yet reached Chicago. The Department of Justice (DOJ) (plaintiff) believed that the rule violated § 1 of the Sherman Act and brought a suit in district court, seeking an injunction to prevent the Board’s rule from being enforced. The Board argued that the rule was not anticompetitive and had, in fact, been implemented to break up a monopoly maintained on to-arrive grain by a small number of grain traders who had taken over the after-hours market. The district court granted the injunction, holding that the rule was a restraint of trade under antitrust law. The Board appealed the decision.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Brandeis, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 219,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.