Braverman v. United States
United States Supreme Court
317 U.S. 49 (1942)
Braverman and others (plaintiffs) were convicted of several separate offenses against the United States tax laws for their illegal manufacture and distribution of liquors. For each of these offenses, they were also charged with conspiracy to commit the offense because the offense arose from an agreement between Braverman and his co-conspirators to commit the offenses. There was only one agreement between the individuals to commit all of the separate offenses for which they were convicted. Braverman petitioned the United States Supreme Court to determine whether he could be convicted of multiple conspiracies deriving from a singular agreement.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Stone, C.J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 174,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.