From our private database of 28,700+ case briefs...
Bridge City Family Medical Clinic, P.C. v. Kent & Johnson, LLP
Court of Appeals of Oregon
346 P.3d 658 (2015)
Kent & Johnson, LLP (defendant) represented Bridge City Family Medical Clinic, P.C. (Bridge City) (plaintiff) in an arbitration. Bridge City believed Kent & Johnson had committed malpractice during the arbitration. Bridge City emailed the firm’s malpractice insurer, the Professional Liability Fund (PLF) to discuss the claim and “the option of a settlement.” PLF wrote back asking Bridge City to “make a specific proposal.” Bridge City wrote that it was “willing to settle this and move on for $40,000.” PLF countered by offering: (1) to pay Bridge City $10,000 in exchange for a release and (2) to have Kent & Johnson release a $5,500 claim against Bridge City for unpaid expenses. Bridge City responded that it would “settle this matter immediately for $20,000.” PLF countered with an offer similar to its prior offer, only it increased the payment to $13,500. Bridge City responded by asserting its belief that Kent & Johnson’s $5,500 claim had already been released and stating that it was “willing to settle for $19,000.” PLF wrote back offering to pay $15,000 on the same terms as before. Bridge City responded that it continued “to be willing to settle this for $19,000.” PLF then sent a letter agreeing to pay Bridge City $19,000. PLF said that the check would be given to Bridge City once it had signed a mutual release of the parties’ claims against each other. Bridge City did not sign the mutual release, instead suing Kent & Johnson in court for malpractice. The trial court dismissed the claim, finding that the parties had already reached a binding settlement agreement. Bridge City appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Garrett, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 546,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 546,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 28,700 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.