Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

Brobeck, Phleger & Harrison v. Telex Corp.

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
602 F.2d 866 (1979)


Facts

Telex Corporation (Telex) (defendant) won a substantial judgment in a federal antitrust lawsuit involving International Business Machines Corporation (IBM). IBM appealed, and the appellate court reversed the district court’s judgment in favor of Telex and instead awarded IBM a substantial judgment on its counterclaims. Telex desired to petition the United States Supreme Court for review and set out to find the most competent antitrust lawyer it could retain. After researching the market of available lawyers, Telex entered into a retainer and fee agreement with an attorney at Brobeck, Phleger & Harrison (Brobeck) (plaintiff). Subject to certain conditions, the fee agreement provided that Brobeck would be entitled to a minimum of $1,000,000 in fees if the case proceeded as far as the filing of a petition for a writ of certiorari with the United States Supreme Court. Brobeck’s fee entitlement would have decreased to $25,000 if the Supreme Court denied the writ of certiorari, but Telex and IBM resolved their dispute through a negotiated settlement before the Supreme Court issued a decision on Telex’s petition. Brobeck withdrew the petition for certiorari and later provided Telex with a bill for $1,000,000. Brobeck filed suit when Telex declined to pay the requested fees; Brobeck won summary judgment at the district court level. Telex appealed the award of summary judgment.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Per Curiam)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 178,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.