Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. United States

United States Supreme Court
556 U.S. 599 (2009)


Facts

Shell Oil Company (Shell) (defendant) supplied Brown & Bryant, Inc. (B&B) (defendant), an agricultural chemical distribution business, with pesticides and other hazardous chemicals. Chemical spills and leaks often occurred when the pesticides were transferred from Shell’s tanker trucks to B&B’s bulk storage tanks. As a result, chemicals seeped into the soil and contaminated the groundwater at the site and on an adjacent parcel of land owned by the Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Company (Railroads) (defendant). Shell was aware of the spills and took some remedial measures to ensure safe handling of the chemicals. Nevertheless, the spills continued. The State of California and the federal Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) (plaintiffs) filed suit against defendants in federal court to recoup more than $8 million in cleanup costs under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA). The district court and Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals held for the State and EPA and found that Shell liable as an “arranger” for the disposal of hazardous waste with knowledge of the spills and subsequent contamination. Additionally, the district court apportioned cleanup costs on the Railroads at 9 percent rather than imposing joint and several liability. The parties appealed various portions of the lower courts’ decisions. The U.S. Supreme Court granted certiorari to review.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Stevens, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Dissent (Ginsburg, J.)

The dissent section is for members only and includes a summary of the dissenting judge or justice’s opinion.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 175,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.