Logourl black
From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...

Burnet v. Sanford & Brooks Co.

United States Supreme Court
282 U.S. 359 (1931)


Facts

From 1913 to 1916, Sanford & Brooks Company (S&B) (plaintiff) performed contractual work for the United States government (government). The government failed to adequately compensate S&B for the contract expenses. Consequently, S&B’s federal tax returns showed net losses for 1913, 1915, and 1916. S&B sued the government to recover its losses on the contract and was finally reimbursed in 1920 for those losses. S&B did not report the reimbursement as part of its gross income for 1920, reasoning that federal tax law imposed income taxes only on the net profits of a transaction. The reimbursement compensated S&B for its losses on the contract, but left S&B with no net profit. The commissioner of internal revenue (commissioner) (defendant) determined that S&B should have included the reimbursement in its gross income for 1920, and assessed back taxes. S&B petitioned the Board of Tax Appeals for review, which ruled for the commissioner. S&B appealed. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reversed, holding that the reimbursement was not income to S&B, but rather a return of S&B’s losses on the contract. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari to review.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Stone, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 222,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.