Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

California Federal Savings & Loan Association v. Guerra

United States Supreme Court
479 U.S. 272 (1987)


Facts

Through enactment of the Pregnancy Discrimination Act of 1978 (PDA), Congress added discrimination on the basis of pregnancy to those forms of employment discrimination prohibited under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII). The second clause of the PDA mandates that pregnant employees be treated the same as nonpregnant employees with respect to employment decisions. California’s Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA) goes beyond the PDA in its prohibition against pregnancy discrimination. FEHA obligates employers subject to Title VII to reinstate employees upon their return from pregnancy disability leave to the same, or a similar, position in the workplace unless no job is available on account of business necessity. Lillian Garland, a receptionist for California Federal Savings & Loan Association (Cal Fed) (plaintiff), went on pregnancy disability leave in January 1982. When she sought to return to Cal Fed in April 1982, she was informed that no positions were available. She filed a complaint before the state Fair Employment and Housing Commission (FEHC) (defendant). Before the complaint was heard, Cal Fed filed a lawsuit against FEHC, seeking an injunction against the FEHA reinstatement requirement and a declaration that the provision is preempted by federal law. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari after the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ruled against Cal Fed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Marshall, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Dissent (White, J.)

The dissent section is for members only and includes a summary of the dissenting judge or justice’s opinion.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 176,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.