Logourl black
From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...

Carter Petroleum Products, Inc. v. Brotherhood Bank & Trust Co.

Court of Appeals of Kansas
97 P.3d 505 (2004)


Facts

Carter Petroleum Products, Inc. (Carter) (plaintiff) sold fuel products to Highway 210, LLC (Highway 210), which operated a gas station. Brotherhood Bank & Trust Co. (Bank) (defendant) issued a letter of credit for the benefit of Carter on the account of Highway 210. The letter of credit provided that Carter could draw on the Bank at sight when it also submitted a statement signed by Carter stating that Highway 210 failed to pay outstanding invoices. The letter of credit required that each draft state that it is “Drawn under [Bank]’s Letter of Credit #2001-270 dated July 26, 2001.” The date of July 26, 2001 was a typographical error that should have been October 19, 2001. Finally, the letter of credit could be drawn upon if presented at the Bank no later than June 26, 2002. Carter attempted to draw upon the letter of credit by presenting documentation on June 26, 2002. The documentation correctly noted the October 19, 2001 date of the letter of credit and was presented at 5:05 p.m. An employee of the Bank had locked the doors of the lobby, but the employee opened the doors and allowed the representative from Carter to come in. Although the lobby closed at 5:00 p.m. on June 26, 2002, the drive-through window was open until 7:00 p.m. The Bank dishonored the draft request by Carter, because the draft was presented after regular banking hours, and the request did not contain the July 26, 2001 date. Carter sued the Bank, and the trial court granted summary judgment to Carter. The Bank appealed to the Court of Appeals of Kansas.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Green, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 221,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.