Logourl black
From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...

Ceja v. Rudolph & Sletten, Inc.

Supreme Court of California
302 P.3d 211 (2013)


Facts

Nancy Ceja (plaintiff), claiming to be Robert Ceja’s putative spouse, filed a wrongful-death action against Rudolph & Sletten, Inc. (Rudolph) (defendant), after Robert’s death. Rudolph argued that Nancy did not have standing to bring the wrongful-death suit because the dissolution of Robert’s previous marriage had not been finalized when he and Nancy held their wedding. Rudolph filed a motion for summary judgment. Under California law, a decedent’s putative spouse could bring a wrongful-death suit if the putative spouse believed in good faith that the marriage to the decedent was valid. Rudolph presented evidence that Robert and Nancy had incorrectly stated on their marriage license that Robert had not been married previously. Nancy had signed the license. Rudolph thus claimed that Nancy did not meet the good-faith requirement under the putative-spouse statute. Nancy responded that she was unaware that Robert’s previous marriage had not been dissolved by the time of their wedding because Robert had refused to discuss the issue. Nancy also stated that she had not read the marriage license but had simply signed it after Robert filled it out. Nancy stated that she acted at all times as though her marriage with Robert was valid, and that she was unaware that it was not. The trial court granted Rudolph’s motion for summary judgment. The court of appeal reversed, and Rudolph petitioned for review.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Baxter, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 219,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.