Logourl black
From our private database of 12,700+ case briefs...

Chaplin v. Dupont Advance Fiber Systems

United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia
303 F. Supp. 2d 766 (E.D. Va. 2004), aff’d, 124 Fed. Appx. 771 (4th Cir. 2005)


Facts

Chaplin and several other Du Pont employees (plaintiffs) sued Du Pont (defendant) for employment discrimination after Du Pont banned the display of Confederate symbols on its premises. Chaplin and the other employees (the employees) claimed this policy discriminated against them based on their national origin, religion, and race. The district court dismissed the employees’ suit. Prior to the court’s dismissal of the case, Du Pont served the employees with a motion for sanctions and a written request that the employees drop the suit within 21 days. Du Pont’s motion for sanctions claimed that the employees’ lawyer should be sanctioned for filing a complaint containing claims that are not supported by law and claims that are not supported by facts. The employees did not drop the suit. Du Pont then filed its motion for sanctions with the district court. The district court found that some of the claims in the employees’ complaint were not supported by facts and sanctioned the employees’ attorney $10,000.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Holding and Reasoning (Hudson, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 121,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 12,700 briefs, keyed to 172 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.