Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

Charles O. Finley & Co., Inc. v. Kuhn

United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
569 F.2d 527 (1978)


Facts

Prior to Major League Baseball’s trading deadline of June 15, 1976, Charles O. Finley & Company, Inc. (Finley) (plaintiff) and the Oakland Athletics sold the rights to the services of players Joe Rudi and Rollie Fingers to the Boston Red Sox for $2 million and the rights to the services of player Vida Blue to the New York Yankees for $1.5 million. Rudi and Fingers were to become free agents upon expiration of their contracts at the end of the 1976 baseball season. Immediately prior to the Athletics’ transaction with the Yankees, Blue signed a three-year contract extension, which was later transferred to the Yankees as part of the agreement. After a brief hearing, baseball Commissioner Kuhn (defendant) disapproved the Athletics’ assignment of Rudi, Fingers, and Blue as being “inconsistent with the best interests of baseball, the integrity of the game, and the maintenance of public confidence in it.” Kuhn expressed concern for (1) the debilitation of the Athletics club, (2) the loss of competitive balance in professional baseball through the buying of success by the wealthier clubs, and (3) the “unsettled circumstances of baseball’s reserve system.” Finley brought suit against Kuhn in district court challenging the Commissioner’s authority to make such determinations. The district court found for Kuhn and Finley appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Sprecher, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 175,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.