Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status
From our private database of 18,800+ case briefs...

Chow v. Reckitt & Colman, Inc.

Court of Appeals of New York
950 N.E.2d 113 (2011)



Yun Tung Chow (plaintiff) worked at a restaurant in New York City. Whenever a drain in the restaurant kitchen became clogged, Chow used a product called Red Devil Lye (RDL), which consisted of 100 percent lye, to unclog it. RDL was made and packaged by Reckitt & Colman, Inc. (R&C) (defendant). Chow did not read English and, consequently, never read the directions for RDL. Those directions stated (1) that protective eyewear and gloves should be worn while using the product, (2) that RDL should not come into contact with aluminum, and (3) that RDL should be applied by placing one tablespoon thereof directly into the clogged drain, waiting 30 minutes, then flushing the drain with several cups of cold water. Chow used the product by following what he had seen others do: he combined one spoonful of RDL with one cup of water, then poured the combination down the drain. On the date of Chow’s injury, the drain became clogged. Chow placed about three spoonfuls of RDL into a dry aluminum container, added three cups of cold water, and then poured the mixture into the drain. The solution splashed back into Chow’s face, causing serious burns and ultimately the loss of vision in one eye. Chow and his wife (plaintiff) sued R&C in a New York state court, alleging inadequate failure to warn and defective design. R&C moved for summary judgment, relying upon Chow’s mishandling of the product and an attorney’s affirmation that (1) RDL was widely known to be dangerous and (2) any change to its formulation would result in a different product. The trial court granted summary judgment to R&C, and the Appellate Division affirmed. The Chows appealed the judgment with respect to the design-defect claim.

Rule of Law


Holding and Reasoning (Lippman, C.J.)

Concurrence (Smith, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 498,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 498,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 18,800 briefs, keyed to 985 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Questions & Answers

Have a question about this case?

Sign up for a free 7-day trial and ask it

Sign up for a FREE 7-day trial