Citizens Bank & Trust v. Brothers Construction & Manufacturing, Inc.

859 P.2d 394 (1993)

From our private database of 46,000+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Citizens Bank & Trust v. Brothers Construction & Manufacturing, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Arkansas
859 P.2d 394 (1993)

  • Written by Rose VanHofwegen, JD

Facts

Citizen’s Bank and Trust (the bank) (plaintiff) held two mortgages against a property. Brothers Construction and Manufacturing, Inc. (Brothers) (defendant) leased the property and occupied it. Brothers did not record its lease in county records. A mechanic’s lien against the property resulted in the bank foreclosing on its mortgages. However, the bank did not join Brothers as a party to the foreclosure action, even though the bank had actual knowledge that Brothers was occupying the property. The bank purchased the property at the foreclosure auction, then demanded that Brothers vacate the property. Brothers refused, prompting the bank to institute a forcible detainer action. The trial court granted summary judgment for Brothers, and the bank appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Lewis, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 743,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 743,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,000 briefs, keyed to 986 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 743,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,000 briefs - keyed to 986 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership