Logourl black
From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...

City of Pasadena v. Califoria-Michigan Land & Water Co.

Supreme Court of California
110 P.2d 983 (Cal. 1941)


Facts

The City of Pasadena (City) (plaintiff) had easements across various parcels of land. Each easement was granted “for the purpose of installing and maintaining water mains” and was “five feet in width.” There was no language in any deed to suggest that any easement was exclusive. California-Michigan Land & Water Co. (California-Michigan) (defendant) received easements from the servient landowners to place its own water mains within the City’s easements, and did so. The City then filed suit for an injunction requiring California-Michigan to remove its water mains. The City claimed that the presence of the additional water mains substantially interfered with its existing water mains, and would prevent from using the full five feet if it should decide to install more water mains in the future. The trial court found that California-Michigan’s water mains did not unreasonably interfere with the City’s use of the easements, and denied the request for an injunction. The City appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Gibson, C.J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 220,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.