Logourl black
From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...

Commissioner v. Indianapolis Power and Light Company

United States Supreme Court
493 U.S. 203 (1990)


Facts

Indianapolis Power and Light Company (IPL) (plaintiff) required its customers with poor credit to pay a deposit. The deposit would remain idle unless it was (1) applied to a customer’s balance after missing a payment, (2) returned to a customer who demonstrated good credit, or (3) returned upon termination of service. The deposit would be returned as cash, a check, or statement credit at the customer’s direction. If IPL held the deposit long enough, IPL would pay a fixed interest on the deposit to the customer. IPL held the deposits in the same account as its other receipts. IPL treated these deposits as liabilities and did not report them as income on its tax returns. The commissioner of internal revenue (defendant) audited IPL’s tax returns and found that the deposits were advance payments for services and were subject to gross-income tax in the year obtained. IPL petitioned the United Stated Tax Court for a redetermination. The tax court found for IPL, and the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit affirmed. The United Stated Supreme Court granted certiorari.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Blackmun, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 221,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.