Minnesota Court of Appeals
2007 WL 2106302 (2007)
Marjorie Conrad (plaintiff) and Walter Fields (defendant) were friends who met in the early 1990s as neighbors in an apartment complex. Fields became a successful and wealthy businessman. Fields was known as a philanthropic individual and sometimes paid for the education expenses of others. In 2000, Conrad was working for Qwest Communications International, Inc., earning a $45,000 salary. Fields suggested that Conrad should attend law school and offered to pay her tuition. Conrad discussed that she had recently paid off some debt and did not want to incur additional debt. Fields stated that he would pay for her tuition. Conrad quit her job and enrolled in law school. Fields began paying Conrad’s tuition, but stopped after an IRS audit froze his assets. Fields assured Conrad that he would pay her tuition once she graduated and passed the bar. However, when Conrad graduated, Fields refused to pay her tuition. Conrad sued Fields under the theory of promissory estoppel. The trial court found in favor of Conrad, and Fields appealed to the Minnesota Court of Appeals.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Peterson, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 221,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.