Continental Laboratories v. Scott Paper Co.
United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa
759 F. Supp. 538 (S.D. Iowa 1990)
In 1987, Continental Laboratories, Inc. (Continental) (plaintiff) and Scott Paper Company (Scott) (defendant) entered into negotiations regarding a supply and distribution agreement. Throughout the summer of 1987, the parties exchanged numerous written drafts of the potential agreement. Following a telephone conference call on either August 25 or 26, 1987, Continental believed that it had entered into a binding oral contract with Scott. Following the conference call, Scott delivered a document stamped “Draft” to Continental and several meetings were held between the parties. Finally on September 16, 1987 Scott informed Continental that they were no longer interested in an agreement. Continental sued Scott for breach of contract based on the oral agreement made on August 25 or 26, 1987. Scott filed a motion for summary judgment claiming that no contract existed between the parties.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Vietor, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 153,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,400 briefs, keyed to 183 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.